Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access

This study compared outcomes of 874 patients who received either two ProGlide devices or one ProGlide plus one FemoSeal for vascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, finding reduced complications with the combination approach.

Histologic and Duplex Comparison of the Perclose and Angio-Seal Percutaneous Closure Devices

Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Head-to-head trial shows superiority of FemoSeal over ProGlide for peripheral interventions

Diana Rachkidi (@RachkidiD) / X

Davide Capodanno sur LinkedIn : In this study, vascular closure after TAVI using a combined suture- and…

Stephan Heo, MD (@StephanHeo) / X

Dr. Gilbert Tang on X: Thoughts on this #TAVR closure study @anvoramd @GuiAttizzaniMD @StevenYakubov @KHERA_MD @JasonFoerst @barbanti_marco @G_Tarantini01 @djc795 @NimeshDesaiMD @jaygirimd @tnazifMD @MCoylewright @HarryDauerman @mszerlip

Reviews of the Abbott Vascular StarClose SE Vascular Closure System

One-year outcomes with two suture-mediated closure devices to achieve access-site haemostasis following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Clinical experience with a novel large bore vascular closure device after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement

/cms/10.2217/fca-2020-0065/a

Vascular access and closure in coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention