Researchers, no matter their discipline or study design, can use OSF to (pre)register their research. Registration refers to archiving one’s study design and outputs (e.g., data or analysis code) so that this information is immutable and persistently available in a public repository. Currently, over 126,000 registrations are archived and publicly available on OSF Registries with more than 453,000 indexed from other community registries. To help researchers register rigorous, reproducible study designs, several registration templates have been implemented on OSF. But as OSF’s user base has continued to grow, the community’s need to archive systematic reviews has become apparent.
Behavioral Sciences, Free Full-Text
Social Psychology Replicability-Index
Our Blog Preregistration
Social, affective, and non-motoric bodily cues to the Sense of Agency: A systematic review of the experience of control - ScienceDirect
Pedro Ricardo Bin (@pedroricardobin) / X
The Open Science Framework, Part 1: pre-registering a study protocol
Social, affective, and non-motoric bodily cues to the Sense of Agency: A systematic review of the experience of control - ScienceDirect
Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews, BMC Infectious Diseases
Characterizing the clinical profile of mania without major depressive episodes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of factors associated with unipolar mania, Psychological Medicine